Election held on 28 April 1951
Criteria for the inclusion of parties in this table are set out in the Glossary under 'listed party'
|Party Name||First preference vote n||First preference vote share %||Change from previous election %||Seats won by ticket n||Seats won by ticket %||Seats won by party n||Seats won by party %||Seats held by party n||Seats held by party %|
|Australian Labor Party||2,029,751||45.88||+0.99||28||46.67||28||46.67||28||46.67|
|Liberal Party - Country Party (joint ticket)||1,925,631||43.52||-1.12||22||36.67|
|Votes for other than listed parties||102,238||2.31||-0.29|
This election in 1951 was a so called double dissolution election for all the members of the Senate held at the same time as a general election for the House of Representatives; see terms of senators. The 1951 House of Representatives results can be seen here.
Electoral System: The Commonwealth Electoral Act 1948 (No.17 of 1948) had changed the electoral system for the Senate from preferential block voting to proportional representation by the single transferable vote (STV) method for Senate elections from 1949 (for the details and context of this change, see the notes for the 1949 Senate election).
Ballot design: The move to proportional representation for Senate elections from 1949 did not require any change in the design of ballot papers. Both the previous preferential block voting and the newly adopted proportional representation by the single transferable vote (STV) method required a voter to rank the individual candidates on the ballot in the order of the voter's choice. The electoral systems differed only in the way the ranked order of candidates on each ballot was counted.
This meant that changes made to Senate ballot papers in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1940 (No.19 of 1940) continued to apply. Section 7 of the 1940 Electoral Act enabled candidates who ran in a party grouping on the ballot paper could agree on the order in which their names would be ranked in the group rather than an alphabetical listing (although no party labels were attached to the groups). Those candidates who ran as Independents were listed in an unmarked group at the end of the ballot paper.
Similarly, under section 17(b) of the 1940 Act, the placing of the groups was decided by lot organized by the Commonwealth Electoral Officer in each state. Section 17(c) applied the same process to decide the order of any Independent candidates within their unmarked group. In addition, the groups of candidates were arranged horizontally on the ballot paper rather than vertically so that the ballot followed the model set out in Form E in the Act.
Voting continued to be compulsory and voters were required to rank all candidates on the ballot paper for their votes to be valid. The membership of the Senate had been increased from 36 to 60 for the 1949 and subsequent elections (for details and context, see the notes to the 1949 Senate election). The likely increase in the number of candidates on the ballot paper in each state, coupled with the absence of party labels for the party groupings on the ballot, presented voters with a challenging task. Political parties aimed to remedy this by issuing how-to-vote cards to aid their supporters to vote for their chosen party and to encourage them to rank party candidates in the party preferred order.
This Senate election in 1951 was the first double dissolution election to be held for the enlarged Senate with all 60 senate seats being contested. An average of 18 candidates contested Senate elections for the ten Senate seats available in each of the six states.
Parties: Since the Liberal Party and Country Party coalition had won office at the 1949 Commonwealth elections, the Menzies government had faced a Senate controlled by the Labor Party. (This was the last time for the remaining 70 years covered by this Database that the Labor Party held a majority of seats in the Senate).The previous Chifley Labor government had made the Commonwealth Bank a key component of its legislation to nationalize banking in Australia. Even though that scheme had been struck down by the High Court in 1947, the changes to the structure of the Commonwealth Bank and the repeal of nationalization provisions proposed by the Menzies government generated fierce opposition from the Labor Party. When the Senate refused to pass the Commonwealth Bank Act 1951 (No. 16 of 1951), Menzies requested a double dissolution election.
At this ensuing election in 1951, the Liberal Party and Country Party coalition government was returned with a comfortable majority in the House of Representatives and a majority of two in the Senate. Menzies's aim to control both houses of the Commonwealth Parliament had been achieved.
Proportional representation produced a close result in the Senate, reflecting the partisan balance in the electorate. As with previous Senate elections since 1946, in all four states with established Country Parties (New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia), the Liberal Party ran joint tickets with the Country Party and elected 22 of the 40 Senate seats available in these four states. In dividing the seats won on joint tickets, the Country Party gained one of the five seats won in New South Wales and Victoria, and two of the six seats won in Queensland and Western Australia; by wining six Senate seats, these two states provided the additional two seats to give the coalition parties their majority in the Senate.
In South Australia and Tasmania there was an even split between the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal Party with each party wining five seats; (in South Australia the state branch of the federal Liberal Party preserved the name Liberal and Country League that it had used for state and federal elections since 1934).
Colin A Hughes and B D Graham, A Handbook of Australian Government and Politics 1890-1964, Canberra; Australian National University Press, 1968 (SBN 708102700); Gerard Newman, Federal Election Results 1949-2001, Canberra: Commonwealth Parliament, Department of the Parliamentary Library, Information and Research Services, Research Paper 9 2001-02, 2002 (ISSN 1328 7478).